• reviews
  • storage
  • Crucial MX300 750GB SSD Review
  • Crucial MX300 750GB SSD Review

    Author:
    Published:

    Benchmarks

    SiSoft Sandra

    Sandra is a software collection of synthetic benchmarks that will give us a basic idea as to what a system is capable of. It should be noted that SiSoft numbers can change depending on what hardware is being tested.  These were recorded using Sandra Professional Version 21.15.2015.1

    ATTO Disk Benchmark

    ATTO Disk Benchmark is a freeware disk benchmarking utility that can test a variety of storage solutions from single hard drives to multi level RAID arrays and solid state disks.  The tests can be broken down to transfer sizes between 512B to 64MB with lengths between 64KB and 32GB.  Testing results are shown on a transfer chart with reads and writes clearly marked.

    For our benchmark the 64MB transfer is being recorded.

    Crystal Disk Mark

    Crystal Disk Mark is a widely available disk benchmarking program that can test a variety of different scenarios from Sequential to Random with Multiple and Single queues.

    For our tests the Sequential and Random test with multiple queues and threads will be recorded.

    Futuremark PCMark 8

    PCMark 8 is an overall system benchmark to measure and compare PC performance using real-world tasks and applications. There are six individual testing scenarios using applications that reflect typical PC use in the home and at the office.  This approach ensures that PCMark measures the things that matter, highlighting performance differences that will be apparent to end users and consumers.

    BAPCo SYSmark 2014

    SYSmark 2014 ver 1.5 is an application-based benchmark that reflects usage patterns of business users in the areas of office productivity, media creation, and data/financial analysis and features the latest and most popular applications from each of their respective fields.    

    Benchmark Conclusion

    As expected the Crucial MX300 drive performed quite well and matched the performance of the faster HyperX Savage.  There were a few instances where the MX300w as slower and others where the drive performed quite a bit better especially with Random reads in the Crystal benchmark.  Of course benchmarks like this really only confirm what you can see when reading the specifications sheet leaving us to hunt deeper for the subtle differences between the drives.

    The important thing to note is that even with the density increase of 3D NAND the overall performance is still comparable to the older planar NAND and with a much cheaper pricetag.